Sample report— this is an example of what we'll deliver for your brand. Get yours →
Back
EngagementAmp
EngagementAmp

AI Visibility Snapshot · May 2026

Acme PM

acmepm.com · Project management for marketing agencies

AI Visibility Score

31/100

Low

Est. monthly AI reach

62.1M

vs. Asana 381M

Total mentions

3.1K

9.4K citations

Executive summary

Acme PM shows a classic visibility paradox: strong on branded queries (people who already know the name), but largely absent on unbranded, high-purchase-intent searches where prospects are actively evaluating tools. The score lags every named competitor by 22+ points. The fastest unlocks are in pain-point and use-case queries, where none of the major AI engines currently surface Acme PM organically.

01 — How you stack up

Competitor benchmark

A

Asana

68

381M/mo
M

Monday.com

61

298M/mo
C

ClickUp

53

212M/mo
A

Acme PM

you

31

62M/mo

02 — Distribution by AI platform

Where your mentions live

Google AI Overview

44.8%

ChatGPT

22.6%

Gemini

17.9%

Perplexity

9.2%

Claude

5.5%

Heavy concentration in Google AI Overview suggests strong traditional SEO authority that's being re-used by AI — but the relative weakness on ChatGPT and Claude points to a gap in the source content those models prefer (long-form forum discussions, structured comparison pages, and Wikipedia-style entity references).

03 — Five categories we tested

Query-by-query analysis

Brand queries

Acme PM dominates branded searches — when buyers already know the name, every engine surfaces accurate info and positive framing.

Keyword
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
acme pm review
Mentioned; positive framing (client portals, time tracking, billable hours); listed 1st with dedicated overview block.
Mentioned; strongly positive, pulls G2 and Capterra rating snippets; ranked 1st with star-rating callout.
Mentioned; positive (agency-specific billing/client management); leads with the product page and clearly summarises pricing tiers.
acme pm pricing
All three plan tiers listed with monthly + annual rates and seat counts; pricing-page link included as primary citation.
Pricing summarised but starts with a comparison table that surfaces Asana and ClickUp first; Acme PM appears 3rd in the table.
Clean breakdown of all tiers and add-ons; explicitly calls out the free client-user pricing as a differentiator.
is acme pm legit?
Reassuring, factual response: founding year, employee count, SOC 2 status, and customer count — high trust signals throughout.
Direct yes, with G2 score, Capterra rating, and Trustpilot mention. Pulls from review aggregators authoritatively.
Confirms legitimacy but hedges with "some users report onboarding friction" — pulled from older Reddit threads.

Competitor queries

Strong on direct comparisons in the agency niche, but loses unprompted mentions in general PM head-to-heads.

Keyword
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
acme pm vs asana
Balanced 200-word comparison; positions Acme PM as the agency pick and Asana for general task management. Neutral-positive overall.
Comparison runs but leans Asana — emphasises Asana's larger user base and integrations; Acme PM gets one paragraph at the end.
Side-by-side comparison; calls out Acme PM as "purpose-built for client-facing teams" and flags Asana as the better generalist.
best asana alternative for agencies
Not in top 3. ClickUp, Monday.com, and Wrike lead; Acme PM only appears in a closing "also consider" bullet.
Listed 4th of 6; positive framing for agency fit but no dedicated section. Loses placement to Trello and Notion.
One-line mention in a 5-tool list — no description, no differentiators surfaced.
monday.com alternatives 2026
Not mentioned in the main 5-tool list. Appears once in a final footnote labelled "niche options."
Mentioned in a 10-tool list at position 8; one sentence, no framing, no link.
Absent from primary recommendations; surfaces only when explicitly asked "any agency-focused options?"

Commercial intent

The most expensive gap. Buyers actively shopping rarely see Acme PM in the consideration set.

Keyword
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
best project management software for marketing agencies
Mentioned; positive framing (client-focused, time tracking, Gantt charts); listed 7th/last, lowest prominence.
Mentioned; strongly positive, highlighted as "Best for Client-Facing Agencies" with dedicated section; ranked 2nd overall, high prominence.
Mentioned; positive (agency-specific billing/client management); listed 5th in main table but elevated in final recommendation as best for agency-specific features, above-average prominence.
project management tool with built-in time tracking and invoicing
Not mentioned. Absent from 5-tool list despite being directly relevant.
Mentioned as option #3 of 6. Positive framing: "robust," "advanced features," "Best for client-facing projects." Middle prominence, not top recommendation; Paymo/Productive pushed as primary picks.
Mentioned once, buried in final "Existing Tools for Reference" footnote alongside competitors. Not featured, not analysed. Effectively invisible.
top project management platforms for consultancies in 2026
Not mentioned. Acme PM absent from 10-platform list dominated by Asana, Trello, Monday.com, ClickUp.
Top placement. Listed #1 with dedicated section, "Best for Client-Facing Work" designation, direct link, strong differentiators (unlimited free client users, transparent reporting). Most favourable treatment of all platforms.
Mentioned but mid-tier. Appears under "Financial-Focused Options" section, not primary recommendations. Brief bullet points, no standout framing. Recommended only for Solo/Small segment alongside ClickUp and Accelo.
buy project management software for client work
Not mentioned. Acme PM absent from ChatGPT's 8-tool list.
Top placement. Listed first, tagged "Best for Agencies & Client Services," described as purpose-built for billable client work, highlighted unlimited free client users, and explicitly recommended as first next step for agencies.
Mentioned twice in tables under "Best for Client-Facing Work" and "Best for Agencies" with descriptor "Built specifically for agencies." Co-recommended alongside ClickUp in final summary, but not given singular top-pick status.
best work management suite for professional services teams
Not mentioned. Completely absent from 8-tool roundup.
Mentioned prominently, listed #1 with "Best Overall for Client-Facing Teams" designation; only tool described as purpose-built for client work; wins comparison table for "simple client billing & easy UI."
Mentioned #3 (bronze) of top picks; positively framed as "Best for client-facing services firms" with key differentiators noted; loses top spots to ClickUp and Monday.com.

Pain-point queries

Almost zero presence where buyers describe the problem first. This is the highest-leverage area to fix.

Keyword
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
how to track billable hours across multiple clients
Not mentioned. Recommends Toggl, Harvest, and Clockify; Acme PM's time-tracking feature is never surfaced despite a category match.
Toggl + Harvest lead. Acme PM absent — even from the "all-in-one" alternatives paragraph where it most belongs.
Generic process advice; the only product mentioned is Toggl. No PM tools surface at all.
how to manage retainer scope creep
Pure process answer (SOWs, change orders). No vendors mentioned; missed opportunity for client-portal positioning.
Lists 3 tools as the answer (Notion, Asana, ClickUp). Acme PM's client-portal feature is the exact answer but isn't named.
Advisory framing only; no products mentioned. Acme PM is the obvious fit and is missing.
agency profitability tracking software
Recommends Productive and Float as top picks; Acme PM not mentioned despite having native profitability reporting.
Lists 4 tools; Acme PM appears 4th but with a generic "also offers profitability tracking" description — no differentiation.
Productive, Float, and Mosaic dominate. Acme PM absent from the consideration set.

Use-case queries

Job-to-be-done searches consistently surface incumbents — Acme PM is missing from most despite clear product/market fit.

Keyword
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
best tool for creative agency workflows
Recommends Notion, Asana, and Monday.com. Acme PM not in the consideration set.
Listed 5th of 7. Framing emphasises Wrike and Adobe Workfront for creative teams; Acme PM gets one neutral line.
Trello + Asana lead. Acme PM absent — no mention of agency-specific positioning despite clear category match.
pm software for retainer-based agencies
Recommends Productive, Scoro, Function Point. Acme PM not surfaced.
Mentioned 3rd of 5; positive description ("strong for agencies billing on retainer") but loses top picks to Productive and Scoro.
Productive named as the top pick. Acme PM appears as a single-line "also consider" footnote.
time tracking software for marketing agencies
Toggl, Harvest, and Clockify lead. Acme PM not mentioned even as an all-in-one alternative.
Lists Acme PM at position 4 of 6 with neutral framing; emphasises Toggl and Harvest as best-in-class.
Harvest recommended first; Acme PM not in the response despite native time-tracking + agency positioning.
Cell colorStrong placementMentioned, mid-tierBuried or absent

04 — What we'd do next

Closing the gap

01

Build contextual mentions where buyers research

Reddit (r/agency, r/marketing), Quora, YouTube reviews, and LinkedIn long-form. Target pain-point and commercial-intent queries — that's where Acme PM is invisible today.

02

Implement entity + structured data signals

SoftwareApplication, Organization, FAQ, AggregateRating, and BreadcrumbList schema. AI engines lean heavily on structured signals when deciding which products to surface.

03

Publish differentiated on-site content for the gap queries

Specifically: "how to track billable hours," "agency profitability," "retainer scope." Clear headings, fresh data, and use-case-led framing — built for AI extraction, not just human readers.

Want one of these for your brand?

Free for a limited time. We'll run the same 40+ queries across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity and email you the full report within 24 hours.

This is an illustrative sample using fictional company data. Your report will use real data sourced directly from each AI engine.