See which sources ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini cite when they answer about your category, and where you're missing.
We ran this playbook for a brand-new supplement brand with zero footprint. ChatGPT now answers with a full breakdown, citing the Reddit threads we built.
$0 ad spend. Evidence walked through on every call.
How it works
Most tools stop at the report. Our analysis exists to feed the engine that gets you into the answer.
We run your buyers' real prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini, and record every source each answer leans on, engine by engine, prompt by prompt.
Citations roll up into a ranked source list for your category: the domains and exact pages AI trusts, how often each one appears, and who it favors.
Where competitors are cited and you're not, we don't hand you a to-do list. Our Reddit engine builds the ranked, credible content that becomes the next citation.
Core capabilities
The domains AI actually draws from when it answers about your category, ranked by how often they appear across engines and prompts. This is the authority graph that decides who gets recommended.
Typical source graph, B2C category
Not just domains, the exact URLs behind each answer. In most buying categories, a handful of ranked threads and posts do the heavy lifting. Those URLs are the real estate that matters.
The sources that cite your competitors but never mention you, ranked by how often they surface. Every entry is a concrete target: a thread to enter, a comparison to correct, a conversation to start.
Models update, publishers rise and fade. We track how your category's citation graph shifts over time, so you see a source gaining influence before your competitors do.
This is where we differ from every tracking tool: analysis is the input, not the product. The gaps feed straight into our Reddit engine, real threads, real conversation, until the answer cites you.
The receipts

Keep exploring
FAQ
AI citation analysis is the practice of recording which sources AI engines reference when they answer questions about a category, then ranking those sources by influence. It shows you the pages ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini treat as trustworthy, the closest thing AI search has to a backlink graph.
Backlinks measure which pages link to you; citations measure which pages AI engines actually quote when they generate an answer. A site with modest link metrics can dominate AI answers if it hosts the conversations AI trusts, which is exactly why ranked Reddit threads punch far above their domain-authority weight.
It varies by category and engine, but community and review content consistently outperforms brand sites: Reddit threads, YouTube walkthroughs, Wikipedia, and comparison platforms. Engines want independent evidence of what real people recommend, not marketing copy.
Reddit threads rank on Google for buying-intent searches, and AI engines lean on ranked, credible conversation when forming recommendations. One thread that holds a page-one position can shape answers across multiple engines at once, we've watched a brand go from invisible to described by name in ChatGPT off the back of threads we built.
Yes, that's the difference between us and a tracking tool. Tools show you the citation gap; our Reddit engine closes it with real, human-run engagement that earns rankings and becomes the source AI pulls from. Analysis is step one, placement is the product.
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, alongside the Google rankings and Reddit threads that feed them. Coverage runs per tracked prompt, so you see exactly which buyer questions you win and lose.
Run the free AEO report: enter your website, and we map your current citation footprint, where AI mentions you today, which sources shape your category, and where to strike first. It's free, and it takes a 15-minute call to walk through.
Free citation report first. Then a 15-minute call to walk through it.